In The Law of Sines, Scalia takes a stab at defining the laws of nature and states that two different numbers mean two different things
He states that an argument in favor of a concept means that it is true. I know that this is a strange definition of the law of Sines, but he clearly points out an absurdity when it comes to his argument.
In his opinion Scalia uses two examples of how the different numbers have to do with one another in order for it to be true. There are nine days in a week and the number of stars can change on any given day, so he concludes that because there are nine days it must be either the same number or something less than nine. It is an absurdity.
A better example of this absurdity can be found in religious laws and the laws of nature. The laws of nature say that in order for an action to be performed it has to be accomplished in sevens. The second law of thermodynamics is an example of this.
In The Law of Sines definition of the law of Sines he cites the second law of thermodynamics. He says, “If the sun does not have a mass, then it cannot be made hot. It must have a mass to be hot.” He clearly indicates that the only thing that can make the sun hot is either light heat, or something that goes by the name of ‘mass.’
Of course this type of logic could lead to ridiculous conclusions. In fact, many of the questions of evolution seem to lead to silly conclusions, which he apparently did not use in his opinion. The fact is that mass does not determine how hot the sun is. Just because a person believes that he or she has discovered some fact does not make it a fact. How can anything be real if you cannot define it?
Another example of this type of absurdity is found in law as well. In a world where many laws would be too unworkable for humans to understand, it might make sense to use an engineer for our needs, but it makes no sense to put someone into a cage and take away their will to live.
If people believed the absurd statements that religion holds, such as that the soul leaves our body when we die, there would be more problems with our planet. In fact, many of the world’s problems stem from the absurd concepts that religions hold about life, death, and heaven.
It is always difficult to decipher logic that is completely arbitrary. People write my term paper cheap believe they know how the world works, but we can never really know how the world really works.
When people place mathematical and common laws together without regard to whether they make sense or not, they are creating an illusion of reality. In the law of sines example of him giving us his definition of the law of sines he says, “Three numbers mean three different things.” He uses this example of zero and ten to illustrate the idea.
Zero and ten are commonly used as the basis for measurements and calculations, but that does not mean that they represent the same number. The expression “ten hours” means the same thing as “ten hours.” However, when you look up for ten hours in a dictionary you will see that “hours” represents only one definition.
In the book, Islamic Law and Government: The Wisdom of God’s Law, Thomas Sowell points out that there are hundreds of laws in the law of sines and that some of them make no sense whatsoever. The concept of Allah defining the universe and creating laws that we have to obey is impossible.
For example, he talks about the law of Omar Kamakh, which states that all nations must accept Islam. However, he points out that in the ten commandments that God wrote down for Moses, he specifically said that only Egypt was to be governed by these laws.